"The government of tomorrow"

5 Tools


Competition Bidding
Also know as Managed Competition

 5 Tools

  There are a number of terms used to describe the new dynamics of not simply relying on the traditional government department to perform a function, such as paving roads. 
  Managed competition, outsourcing, privatization, and competitive bidding  are some of the keywords used to describe ways of bridging a budget deficit and saving taxpayers money. Each term is similar, in that they involve allowing outside, private firms to bid for the services a government is to provide. However, there are some additional connotations that are important to note.
  The terms "privatization" and "outsourcing" is anathema to public employee unions, as these denote the loss of work for its members and an assumption that those workers who had previously done the work within the government structure would no longer be doing the function.
  "Managed competition" and "competitive bidding" give due respect to the notion that the public employees will have a fair chance to compete against private workers. However, the total cost of providing the service, including all overhead, will have to be calculated. Under competitive bidding, a department bids for the work like a private vendor. In the advanced model even outside public agencies may look to pick up new revenues by bidding for a neighboring government's work.
  While certain elements of public employee unions, such as the Indianapolis local chapter of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) have adopted this new dynamic, others have yet to see the win/win prospect of a competitive structure.
  Managed competition involves a partnership between managers and workers, in which the union is not allowed to forestall competition, yet workers are reassured as well. This model has worked in many areas with a promise not to lay off current workers. Through cross-training and proper incentives, much can be done to gain a solid working relationship within the new system with the union. The managers and workers learn to pull together to focus on the outcomes.


 

DEPLOYING MANAGED COMPETITION

Here are some of the places using competitive bidding

CITIES
Phoenix, AZ
Indianapolis, IN
Charlotte, NC
Plano, TX
COUNTIES
San Diego County, CA
STATES
Washington

 

AFSCME UNION SUPPORTS INDY COMPETITION

Steve Fantauzzo of the Indianapolis local AFSCME, has led the charge for competitive bidding. The Indianapolis union has thrived under this system. It became the method for the union to overcome a privatization strategy.

See Interview with Fantauzzo
Also, watch Real Video Fantauzzo speech

 
(Video courtesy of Frontier Centre for Public Policy, Winnipeg.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Ideas &
Solutions 
Blueprint for 
Los Angeles
"Competitive Government for a Competitive Los Angeles." by William Eggers
   --Reason Pub. Policy
New Zealand Competitive Model
Facing a budget crisis, the left wing government of the time turned to a competitive model of government, with huge rewards. Lessons learned from New Zealand
    --Reason Pub. Policy


Home   |   5 Tools   |   Indy Experience   |   Innovation  |  Site Map
Regional News:   Oregon   |   Washington   |   British Columbia

Site Best Viewed with Internet Explorer© 5.5 or above. Also, extensive use of
Adobe Acrobat Reader
©, Microsoft© PowerPoint©, and Microsoft Excel©


Brought to you by: 

 

Home   |   5 Tools   |   Indy Experience   |   Innovation  |  Site Map
Regional News:   Oregon   |   Washington   |   British Columbia

Site Best Viewed with Internet Explorer© 5.5 or above. Also, extensive use of
Adobe Acrobat Reader
©, Microsoft© PowerPoint©, and Microsoft Excel©

 Brought to you by Freedom Consulting